Shows & Blogs
Insiders
Featured Pages
Related Links


The Silent Election
Posted 9/18/2012 1:08:00 AM

Yesterday, in an attempt to balance the editorial on the firing of school-teacher Lynden Dorval, I offered equal time to anyone who wanted to defend his termination.  Instead I got more mail offering support and decrying his firing, but there was one letter, from Paul, who says Dorval broke the rules so he should be fired.  Paul says if he disagreed with the policy he should have quit and run for a seat on the school board.  Speaking of which, you need to see the video of last week’s school board meeting. Hear from teachers about what really goes on inside Ross Sheppard High School.  It may also make you wonder why the education minister doesn’t step in and resolve some questions.  The video only a few minutes long and you may be shocked at what other educators revealed to the board.  Ross Shep parents will especially want to hear the opinions of the third speaker.

Start watching at 11:00 and watch till the end.  It's just a few minutes.

http://www.livestream.com/edmontonpublicschools/video?clipId=pla_0a121add-3242-4d71-872b-ceb372e74e73&utm_source=lslibrary&utm_medium=ui-thumb

Just one more reason to ensure that next time, October 21st, 2013, the voting for school trustees is not known as the “silent election” of people we may know little about.  Just to be clear, the EPSB wants to make sure you know the trustees did not fire Dorval.  We understand that, but they are the policy makers, and we'll wait to see what they decide about the no-zero policy and what else they stand for when it comes to educating our children.  Let me know what you think.

Note: If you wish to leave a comment, please keep it no longer than my editorial, unless you wish us to edit it. Your comment will not appear on the blog until it has been cleared by Bob.

 You have until 1 o’clock tomorrow morning to collect 630 CHED Insider Trading points by following the URL below & entering the code word: 104

 Click here to enter the code!

Posted By: Bob Layton  

Leave a comment:

showing all comments · Subscribe to comments
Comment Like
  • 30
  1. Robert posted on 09/18/2012 06:47 AM This comment was edited by a moderator at 07:14 AM on 09/18/2012
    To quote Harry Morgan from MASH, AKA Sherman T. Potter, "Stupid rules were meant to be broken."

    A little reality check for Paul who defended the termination. According to that video, Dorval broke the no-zero rule. Yet his termination violated numerous rules in the book.

    I think the majority would agree that the one who should have been terminated is the principal. And of course this is not the first time that the policies of new rules violates almost every other rule in the book. I know my former job had a rule where instead of assigned breaks, everyone takes their break at the same time to combat people abusing their break privileges.

    The punch line was the lunch room was crowded, the cook was becoming overwhelmed, no one was picking up the slack for the orders, plus the policy didn't work at all.

    Oh, and a former co-worker got fired because of language used against the one manager, and the same manager was violating numerous other policies when she swore at him. Who should have gotten fired?
  2. lil posted on 09/18/2012 09:06 AM
    Dear Mr. Layton,

    Paul is only partly right. Remember the Nuremburg trials. Every good little Nazi used the same excuse: "I vas only followink orderse." In the case of Dorval, he did not follow an idiotic and destructive order and protested in the only way he felt was effective. He is to be commended, not fired. I have to wonder if Paul has children ..... If so, I pity them.
    1. Paul posted on 09/18/2012 02:04 PM This comment was edited by a moderator at 05:49 PM on 09/18/2012
      @lil Why is it that nothing can be discussed anywhere without someone comparing it to Nazis? This is beyond ridiculous.

      Bob replies: You are right - nothing compares.
  3. fred posted on 09/18/2012 09:10 AM This comment was edited by a moderator at 09:34 AM on 09/18/2012
    Well if Paul's rational was followed in the real world, how many politicians would be working today??
    Oh, and speaking about the education minister, is not doing your job breaking a rule??
    1. Bob $ posted on 09/18/2012 10:21 AM This comment was edited by a moderator at 10:59 AM on 09/18/2012
      @fred GO MR. DORVAL!!!! You rock MAN!!!! YOU ROCK!!!!......You just don't ROLL!
  4. Ken posted on 09/18/2012 10:18 AM
    Just like to mention that today I will be taking my education taxes away from the Public School ... I have 3 city properties ... I am not catholic but let the public system go down ... I will also not be voting for my current trustee and would hope that all in Twin Brooks do the same,

    In regards to the hopefully new rink ... does anyone remember when city council reveiwed building the HUSKY TOWER on 112 St & Jasper ... city council in their wisdom (lol) said no and CALGARY took the Husky Tower and the oil industry with them ... I WONDER WHICH CITY WILL GET THE OILERS ... if we can spent $300M on a 23 Ave interchange for cars we can borrow the damn money ... I will throw in $1000. if everyone else would or some people ... we would not even have to borrow .... Build the arena and get it over with ... before Calgary takes the plans south ... Ken
    1. sb posted on 09/18/2012 10:44 PM
      @Ken It isn't good enough to note vote for a particular trustee, many get in by acclamation because there is no-one to run against them. And the Catholic system is no better, look at the current strike. It's all politics, from BOTH sides. They play us right up to elections and/or contract negotiations. The same way the PC's play head games with the tax payers; they're not interested in our opinions, then just want to be seen to be interested, then they cram their agenda down our throats.
  5. Pat Hall posted on 09/18/2012 10:47 AM
    Having watched the video, I see that, once again, the game of academia shows up. The stupid, but political savvy people run the show and keep enforcing their stupid rules on the intelligent, hard-working majority.
  6. AllenR_5214 posted on 09/18/2012 10:48 AM
    I watched the video this morning regarding the school board meeting about no zero policy. My hearing is not so good any more and some of the audio was difficult for me to hear clearly. However from what I have heard it appears that the principal at Ross Sheppard is behaving as an authority unto himself or ,worse yet, is a beurocratic puppet of the school board. According to the video there appears to be no supporting evidence that a no zero policy works, except maybe in the opinion of the school boards self-justifying policy. I once seriosly wanted to be a teacher until I learned that that I had no apparant aptitude for teaching. However it seems unfair and unjustified to see competent teachers being fired because they oppose a school policy that apparantly is not supported by any qualified research and has evidently been shown by competent teachers to be ineffective in achieving the fundamental goal of any school system that of preparing students for the reality of the real world they will face once they leave school. I know that i would not want to teach in this environment.
  7. David W. Lincoln posted on 09/18/2012 11:03 AM
    A list needs to be made: Whom is the most likely to get politics out of the classroom, and then go down to the EPSB, which demonstrates it is the least likely to get politics out of the classroom.
  8. Schmidt Supporter posted on 09/18/2012 11:57 AM This comment was edited by a moderator at 05:56 PM on 09/18/2012
    Anyone of you 'outraged' Dorval supporters read the letter of suspension that Schmidt sent to Dorval last May?

    Anyone?

    I am assuming not because everyone is assuming that the 'fired for giving zero's' headlines are accurate.

    Let me first say I agree with Dorval on the zero policy. I do not agree with his actions that led to his dismissal. He should have been fired - his own union will tell you that.

    Dorval did not get fired for giving zeros. He got them for disobedience, unprofessionalism, not fulfilling his obligations as a teacher and flagrantly disregarding the superintendent of schools.

    Here is the dismissal letter. Read WHY Dorval was fired. It has more to do with poor and unprofessional behaviour than anything.

    https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B77V4y9Q1a34UE1aS0NFaVM5YUk/edit

    Bob replies: It was well-publicized that he was fired for insubordination. The public is still over-whelmingly on his side.
    1. Graham posted on 09/18/2012 07:04 PM This comment was edited by a moderator at 03:50 AM on 09/19/2012
      @Schmidt Supporter The public is overwhelmingly on the side of legalizing marijuana ... can the students go to school stoned citing your logic Bob?

      Bob replies: My logic does not confuse a principal's rules with the Criminal Code.
    2. travis posted on 09/18/2012 07:36 PM
      @Schmidt Supporter insubordination= he gave a zero, disobedience=he gave zeros, unproffesionalism=he gave zeros, flagrantly disregarding the superintendant of schools=he gave zeros. these can all be summed up as Mr. Dorval giving the entire establishment the 1 finger salute in regards to this ridiculous "no zeros" "policy". As for the NOT fullfilling his duty as a teacher, I strongly believe they had that backwards! He DID fulfill his sworn duties to FULLY PREPARE HIS STUDENTS for the REAL world where when you do not do your work YOU GET FIRED!
  9. Allen posted on 09/18/2012 12:56 PM
    Check this website for anybody interested. ENJOY!
    http://www.deliberatedumbingdown.com/
    1. The Infidel - Mr John posted on 09/21/2012 11:14 AM
      @Allen Thank you for posting that link....I had lost it.
      Everyone should read this article.....it will OPEN YOUR EYES!!!!
      Maybe even "kick start" your brain!?!
  10. CarlS_6028 posted on 09/18/2012 05:57 PM
    "We have learned by sad experience that it is the nature and disposition of almost all men, as soon as they get a little authority, as they suppose, they will immediately
    begin to exercise unrighteous dominion."
    I believe the principal of the school may well fit into this category.
  11. Lorinda posted on 09/18/2012 06:26 PM
    If the kids don't do the work they deserve to fail. When they get a job in the REAL WORLD it is expected that they do their job or get fired. I really think this teacher had the students best interest in mind. I think the school and school board are scared to face the parents of these children that got the zero and the parent's anger. Personally if one of my kids got a zero I'd turn around and ask the child and set up a meeting with the teacher.
  12. Shawn Allen posted on 09/18/2012 06:46 PM
    Wow, Bob

    Thanks for the Video. I have read the various letters and I support Dorval totally.

    The principal and the superintendent seem to have taken the insubordination as a very personal attack. Unless the School Board Acts, I can only conclude it is totoally disfunctional.

    I am glad my kids are in the St.Albert (Protestant) system where we have had fantastic principals at Leo Nickerson elementary, Sir Grorge Simpson Jr. High and now Paul Kane High School. Teachers have been first-rate all the way.
  13. Mina posted on 09/18/2012 07:10 PM
    I would like a job at that school, or better yet school board. I feel if the students cant get a zero for not doing assignments. I should be able to get a paycheck for not doing any work!!!!! They can give zeros either in my opinion.
  14. Anonymous posted on 09/18/2012 07:16 PM This comment was edited by a moderator at 03:49 AM on 09/19/2012
    A few years ago, I was present at a department meeting at the Centre for Education where a Superintendent outlined his desire to see a 100% graduation rate in the not too distant future. This notion, while noble and one I like to see in a Superintendent, seemed a bit far-fetched, and unrealistic. How could one possibly see a graduation rate that high??

    Solution: The fabled No Zero Policy... Students are going to be graduating whether they deserve it or not.

    If you have an impossible goal, just remove merit from the equation!
  15. Travis posted on 09/18/2012 07:23 PM This comment was edited by a moderator at 03:48 AM on 09/19/2012
    I just watched this video and I am quite appalled at this school board! I am very very thankful my 8yo daughter will NEVER attend an EPSB school after seeing this. I HOPE Mr. Dorval sues the Board and the Principle for unjust dismissal as this IS unjust. The no zero policy is the most retarded thing that this school board has ever done, and believe me they have done some real stupid things. Including accusing my 7yo stepson of CHEATING because he was doing grade 1 work here that was already covered in Kindergarten while we lived in Cold Lake the year prior. Even with the transcript outlining what he had already learned they insisted he CHEATED at ALL his tests and therefore were going to "hold him back a grade" after we, at the beginning of the year and finding out he covered their Grade 1 curriculum the year prior in Kindergarten, we asked he be moved to grade 2 and were denied immediately, Hence the reason my daughter will now never set foot in one of their schools.
  16. RANJ posted on 09/18/2012 07:24 PM
    My mother was a teacher for over 40 years, and I can tell you first-hand that she bucked the "system" frequently. When they came up with new "improved" methods for teaching reading (she was a 1st-grade teacher), she stuck to phonics. She segregated her classroom, so that those who needed extra time and attention were in one section, and those who could work independently - and excel - were in another. She was not popular with the administration. But if you ask any of her students, they will tell you that they LEARNED. That is what we want from teachers. We want them to inspire our children to LEARN. They are not there to stroke egos or boost self-confidence. That's what students will get by accomplishing their assignments. If they don't complete them, they have not learned, nor have they gained any sense of accomplishment. That's a fail on both sides, and I don't agree with it.
    If I had a vote on the Edmonton Public School Board, I'd vote whoever is there out. You are not being fair to the young people of today at all. Get a grip with reality.
    In the meantime, I'm glad my kids are finished with school now. And I'm glad my mom was around during their formative years, to help them learn.
  17. MARGARET posted on 09/18/2012 07:25 PM
    Thank you Mr. Layton for posting the video! I hope every Edmontonian phones the Minister of Education tomorrow and demand he start investigating this issue. As an Edmontonian I will be sure to look at who is sitting on the school board at present and be sure that I don't vote for them come election time. I have two kids in high school - if they don't do the work they don't get the marks - that is life. If I don't work, I don't get paid. All I can say is that I am glad my children don't go to Ross Shepard High School and I have to wonder why the parents of students at Ross Shepard High School have not prrotested the firing of Mr. Dorval. Come on Edmonton, let us stand behind what is right.
  18. John L posted on 09/18/2012 07:59 PM
    The board needs a priority management course relating to their topics and wasted time. After wasting my time watching the video I feel that I can't in good faith support the public school board in taxes and will switch to the Catholic School Board. It's deplorable the way they prioritize the education of our children(Alberta's future) and teachers. They worry more about saving a few dollars on energy than our future generation's education.
  19. Chris posted on 09/18/2012 08:04 PM
    I only caught your segment today and I wish I had seen it yesterday to write in. As a fellow teacher, I understand Mr. Dorval's stance on giving zeroes however it misses the point of the profession as it stands today. Teachers are required to teach the assigned curriculum in a manner that provides each student a chance to succeed. Teachers then assesses each student based on observations, evidence and conversations. After that they report their findings(a mark) and provide support for improvement. If a student fails to complete an assignment or doesn't show up, they can't be assessed. No mark can be given because the teacher has no evidence to support a zero(knowing absolutely nothing). In this case an "incomplete" is given and the result stays the same. You can't pass a course/graduate with incompletes. An incomplete is a true reflection of the teacher's assessment. I don't condone student laziness or "breezing by" in classrooms but I do believe in teachers going out of their way to reach each student in personal ways to help them succeed. If one of my students "fails", then I need to look at how I can help them succeed and keep trying until that student is out of my care. I may not reach every student but my job is to continue to try. I don't know Mr. Dorval however I have met many teachers that also support giving zeros and it seems a large majority of this group don't go the extra mile to reach their students, particularly in high schools. Many may think this is bending over backwards to a generation of slackers however the "everybody gets the same lesson" days are over. If your child learned and excelled when taught in a specific manner would you want your child's teacher completely ignoring this? Teachers need to be balanced in their teaching approach to assure all learning styles are addressed on a regular basis. It's just good teaching.
    1. fred posted on 09/19/2012 10:53 AM
      @Chris Teaching life skills such as being accountable and taking responsibility is where good teaching starts. The "no zero" policy comes no where near doing this.
      Who is to say that all the other good things your writing about was not done as well as giving zero's when they were deserved???
  20. Bob posted on 09/19/2012 07:48 PM This comment was edited by a moderator at 03:42 AM on 09/20/2012
    I find it disquieting that the public school board, and in particular the actions of management at Ross Sheppard High School devolved from the best interests of the students to power politics. Clearly those who favour the idea that management rules by fiat think that power politics and absolute fealty by staff is the only correct way. This is wrong. Mr. Dorval was correct in giving zeros. In the real world, where I live, if a company gave out brochures instead of product (1% of what was promised on the contract), they would be unpaid at best, and sued into the ground at worst. If on a test, if you don't fill any answers, do you get 100%? Of course not. Mr. Dorval needs to run for the board in October 2013. He *will* handily win.

    I know a lot of teachers (each one a trained, university educated professional), who think the no-zero policy is somewhere between stupid and utter madness. This board *must* be thrown out. The 'no zeros' policy is absolute rubbish. Its obtuse to think otherwise. Those who simply want to stand on the protocol of insubordination clearly aren't fit to lead anyone (and again in the real world, people who lead with stupid ideas, don't lead for long). October 2013 will demonstrate this.

    Bob replies: The board is re-evaluating the no zero policy.
  21. Fred posted on 09/20/2012 10:38 PM
    Rick Wormelli on Zeroes
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y-BWioq7MGo&
showing all comments

Recent Blog Entries

BLOG ARCHIVE
<<May 2013>>
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
2829301234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930311
2345678